Use compatibility for recurring dynamics
If the question is about why the same friction, attraction, or misunderstanding keeps happening, compatibility is usually the better first layer.
Relationship tool choice
Many relationship questions feel emotional enough that users reach for the sharpest tool available. The better distinction is simpler: compatibility is for fit and recurring pattern, while Liu Yao is for immediate action and decision timing.
How to choose
If the question is about why the same friction, attraction, or misunderstanding keeps happening, compatibility is usually the better first layer.
If the question is “Should I reach out now?” or “Will this conversation move?” the issue is no longer only relational pattern. It is a timing decision.
Compatibility explains the structure. Liu Yao helps with what to do inside that structure right now.
Some relationship strain is current timing rather than permanent mismatch. Monthly context still matters.
Best next step
If you need to understand the bond, start with compatibility. If you already understand the bond and need the next move, step into Liu Yao.
Keep reading
Clarify the relationship question before moving into a two-profile reading.
Read compatibility prep guideUse this when the current season may be doing more of the damage than the underlying fit itself.
Read timing guideUse this if the question has already shifted from relational pattern into a real decision fork.
Read decision guideFAQ
Not automatically. Emotional intensity does not always mean the question is a decision question. Sometimes you still need the pattern layer first.
Not very well. Compatibility can explain the relationship shape, but a text-today question is usually better handled by a decision layer.
Because users trust the platform more when each tool has a clear job instead of pretending one product answers everything.